Re: [PATCH v2 09/26] media: v4l: async: refactor v4l2_async_create_ancillary_links

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Hans

Your proposal is what I sent for v1:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-media/20240415-fix-cocci-v1-9-477afb23728b@xxxxxxxxxxxx/

I have no strong opinion for any of the two, please feel free to land
whatever version you prefer.


Regards

On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 at 20:46, Laurent Pinchart
<laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 06:17:31PM +0000, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 12:55:20PM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > > On 19/04/2024 11:47, Ricardo Ribalda wrote:
> > > > Return 0 without checking IS_ERR or PTR_ERR if CONFIG_MEDIA_CONTROLLER
> > > > is not enabled.
> > > >
> > > > This makes cocci happier:
> > > >
> > > > drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c:331:23-30: ERROR: PTR_ERR applied after initialization to constant on line 319
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c | 7 +++----
> > > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c
> > > > index 4bb073587817..915a9f3ea93c 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c
> > > > @@ -316,9 +316,10 @@ v4l2_async_nf_try_all_subdevs(struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier);
> > > >  static int v4l2_async_create_ancillary_links(struct v4l2_async_notifier *n,
> > > >                                        struct v4l2_subdev *sd)
> > > >  {
> > > > - struct media_link *link = NULL;
> > > > + struct media_link *link;
> > > >
> > > > -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MEDIA_CONTROLLER)
> > > > + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MEDIA_CONTROLLER))
> > > > +         return 0;
> > > >
> > > >   if (sd->entity.function != MEDIA_ENT_F_LENS &&
> > > >       sd->entity.function != MEDIA_ENT_F_FLASH)
> > > > @@ -326,8 +327,6 @@ static int v4l2_async_create_ancillary_links(struct v4l2_async_notifier *n,
> > > >
> > > >   link = media_create_ancillary_link(&n->sd->entity, &sd->entity);
> > > >
> > > > -#endif
> > > > -
> > > >   return IS_ERR(link) ? PTR_ERR(link) : 0;
> > > >  }
> > >
> > > I think I would prefer:
> > >
> > > static int v4l2_async_create_ancillary_links(struct v4l2_async_notifier *n,
> > >                                          struct v4l2_subdev *sd)
> > > {
> > > #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MEDIA_CONTROLLER)
> > >     struct media_link *link;
> > >
> > >     ...
> > >
> > >     return IS_ERR(link) ? PTR_ERR(link) : 0;
> > > #else
> > >     return 0;
> > > #endif
> > > }
> > >
> >
> > Me, too.
>
> I actually prefer Ricardo's proposal :-)
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Laurent Pinchart



-- 
Ricardo Ribalda




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux