On Fri, 5 Apr 2024 at 14:57, Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 at 08:47, Dmitry Baryshkov > > <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> > >> The ath10k driver fails to properly handle fallback from board-2.bin to > >> board.bin for WCN3990 cards. This happens because the > >> ath10k_hw_params_list doesn't include .fw.board* parameters for the > >> WCN3990 platform. > >> > >> Add board data configuration for WCN3990. While we are at it, merge > >> common pieces of BDF support: drop .board and .eboard names from struct > >> ath10k_hw_params_fw and use the common name instead. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> Dmitry Baryshkov (3): > >> wifi: ath10k: populate board data for WCN3990 > >> wifi: ath10k: drop chip-specific board data file name > >> wifi: ath10k: drop fw.eboard file name > >> > >> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.c | 32 ++++------------------------- > >> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/hw.h | 14 ++----------- > >> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/pci.c | 10 ++++----- > >> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/targaddrs.h | 3 +++ > >> 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-) > >> --- > >> base-commit: 596764183be8ebb13352b281a442a1f1151c9b06 > >> change-id: 20240129-wcn3990-board-fw-a2d97507a712 > > > > Kalle, Jeff, is there anything pending on me on this series? > > This is in my queue (Deferred state): > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/?series=821157&state=*&order=date > > Unfortunately there is not really much time for ath10k nowadays so there > will be delays. > > -- > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ > > https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches Please excuse me, can we get at least patch 1? It fixes an actual issue with WCN3990 which prevents us from testing board data files (or adding new boards) without fixing board-2.bin first. The driver ignores board.bin even if it is present on rootfs. -- With best wishes Dmitry