Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/msm: don't clean up priv->kms prematurely

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 4/19/2024 7:33 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
MSM display drivers provide kms structure allocated during probe().
Don't clean up priv->kms field in case of an error. Otherwise probe
functions might fail after KMS probe deferral.


So just to understand this more, this will happen when master component probe (dpu) succeeded but other sub-component probe (dsi) deferred?

Because if master component probe itself deferred it will allocate priv->kms again isnt it and we will not even hit here.

Fixes: a2ab5d5bb6b1 ("drm/msm: allow passing struct msm_kms to msm_drv_probe()")
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_kms.c | 1 -
  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_kms.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_kms.c
index af6a6fcb1173..6749f0fbca96 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_kms.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_kms.c
@@ -244,7 +244,6 @@ int msm_drm_kms_init(struct device *dev, const struct drm_driver *drv)
  	ret = priv->kms_init(ddev);
  	if (ret) {
  		DRM_DEV_ERROR(dev, "failed to load kms\n");
-		priv->kms = NULL;
  		return ret;
  	}




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux