On 3/19/2024 6:22 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
Move a call to dpu_format_populate_plane_sizes() to the atomic_check
step, so that any issues with the FB layout can be reported as early as
possible.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c
index d9631fe90228..a9de1fbd0df3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c
@@ -673,12 +673,6 @@ static int dpu_plane_prepare_fb(struct drm_plane *plane,
}
}
- ret = dpu_format_populate_plane_sizes(new_state->fb, &pstate->layout);
- if (ret) {
- DPU_ERROR_PLANE(pdpu, "failed to get format plane sizes, %d\n", ret);
- return ret;
- }
-
/* validate framebuffer layout before commit */
ret = dpu_format_populate_addrs(pstate->aspace,
new_state->fb,
@@ -864,6 +858,12 @@ static int dpu_plane_atomic_check(struct drm_plane *plane,
return -E2BIG;
}
+ ret = dpu_format_populate_plane_sizes(new_plane_state->fb, &pstate->layout);
+ if (ret) {
+ DPU_ERROR_PLANE(pdpu, "failed to get format plane sizes, %d\n", ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
I think we need another function to do the check. It seems incorrect to
populate the layout to the plane state knowing it can potentially fail.
Can we move the validation part of dpu_format_populate_plane_sizes() out
to another helper dpu_format_validate_plane_sizes() and use that?
And then make the remaining dpu_format_populate_plane_sizes() just a
void API to fill the layout?
