Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: phy: qcom,usb-hs-phy: Add compatible

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 at 07:52, Herman van Hazendonk
<github.com@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Adds qcom,usb-hs-phy-msm8660 compatible
>
> Used by HP Touchpad (tenderloin) for example.
>
> Signed-off-by: Herman van Hazendonk <github.com@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,usb-hs-phy.yaml | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,usb-hs-phy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,usb-hs-phy.yaml
> index f042d6af1594..ccf23170cd17 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,usb-hs-phy.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,usb-hs-phy.yaml
> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ if:
>        contains:
>          enum:
>            - qcom,usb-hs-phy-apq8064
> +          - qcom,usb-hs-phy-msm8660
>            - qcom,usb-hs-phy-msm8960
>  then:
>    properties:
> @@ -41,6 +42,7 @@ properties:
>        - enum:
>            - qcom,usb-hs-phy-apq8064
>            - qcom,usb-hs-phy-msm8226
> +          - qcom,usb-hs-phy-msm8960

This should probably be msm8660 rather than 8960

Note, nowadays the rule would be to use qcom,msm8660-usb-hs-phy
compatible, but I wonder if we should enforce this for such an old
platform or whether similarity wins.

>            - qcom,usb-hs-phy-msm8916
>            - qcom,usb-hs-phy-msm8960
>            - qcom,usb-hs-phy-msm8974
>


-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux