On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 at 11:52, Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Add the cpucp mailbox and sram nodes required by SCMI perf protocol > on X1E80100 SoCs. > > Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100.dtsi | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100.dtsi > index 28f65296781d..4e0ec859ed61 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100.dtsi > @@ -4974,6 +4974,13 @@ gic_its: msi-controller@17040000 { > }; > }; > > + cpucp_mbox: mailbox@17430000 { > + compatible = "qcom,x1e80100-cpucp-mbox"; > + reg = <0 0x17430000 0 0x10000>, <0 0x18830000 0 0x10000>; > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 28 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > + #mbox-cells = <1>; > + }; > + > apps_rsc: rsc@17500000 { > compatible = "qcom,rpmh-rsc"; > reg = <0 0x17500000 0 0x10000>, > @@ -5157,6 +5164,25 @@ frame@1780d000 { > }; > }; > > + sram: sram@18b4e000 { > + compatible = "mmio-sram"; > + reg = <0x0 0x18b4e000 0x0 0x400>; > + ranges = <0x0 0x0 0x18b4e000 0x400>; > + > + #address-cells = <1>; > + #size-cells = <1>; > + > + cpu_scp_lpri0: scmi-shmem@0 { This doesn't seem to follow the schema. > + compatible = "arm,scmi-shmem"; > + reg = <0x0 0x200>; > + }; > + > + cpu_scp_lpri1: scmi-shmem@200 { > + compatible = "arm,scmi-shmem"; > + reg = <0x200 0x200>; > + }; > + }; > + > system-cache-controller@25000000 { > compatible = "qcom,x1e80100-llcc"; > reg = <0 0x25000000 0 0x200000>, > -- > 2.34.1 > > -- With best wishes Dmitry