Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-msm: pervent access to suspended controller

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/04/24 00:13, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Apr 2024 at 20:42, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On 28/03/24 16:20, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>>> On 27/03/24 17:17, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 at 11:25, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 21/03/24 16:30, Mantas Pucka wrote:
>>>>>> Generic sdhci code registers LED device and uses host->runtime_suspended
>>>>>> flag to protect access to it. The sdhci-msm driver doesn't set this flag,
>>>>>> which causes a crash when LED is accessed while controller is runtime
>>>>>> suspended. Fix this by setting the flag correctly.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> Fixes: 67e6db113c90 ("mmc: sdhci-msm: Add pm_runtime and system PM support")
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Mantas Pucka <mantas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>
>>>>> Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>
>>>> Looks like this problem may exist for other sdhci drivers too. In
>>>> particular for those that enables runtime PM, don't set
>>>> SDHCI_QUIRK_NO_LED and don't use sdhci_runtime|suspend_resume_host().
>>>>
>>>> Don't know if there is a better way to address this, if not on a case
>>>> by case basis. Do you have any thoughts about this?
>>>
>>> Yes probably case by case, but I will look at it.
>>
>> There seem to be 3 that use runtime pm but not
>> sdhci_runtime_suspend_host():
>>
>> 1. dwcmshc_runtime_suspend() : only turns off the card clock
>> via SDHCI_CLOCK_CONTROL register, so registers are presumably
>> still accessible
>>
>> 2. gl9763e_runtime_suspend() : ditto
>>
>> 3. sdhci_tegra_runtime_suspend() : disables the functional
>> clock via clk_disable_unprepare(), so registers are presumably
>> still accessible
>>
>> sdhci_msm_runtime_suspend() is different because it also turns
>> off the interface clock.
>>
>> But it looks like there are no similar cases.
> 
> Not sure we should care, but it still looks a bit fragile to me. We
> may also have a power-domain hooked up to the device, that could get
> power gated too, in which case it's likely affecting the access to
> registers.

Thought some more about this, but there isn't an easy way to know
if drivers are catering for SDIO card interrupt or SD card detect
interrupt.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux