Re: [PATCH] drm/msm/dpu: Add callback function pointer check before its call

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 08.04.2024 19:51, Abhinav Kumar wrote:


On 4/8/2024 1:55 AM, Aleksandr Mishin wrote:
In dpu_core_irq_callback_handler() callback function pointer is compared to NULL,
but then callback function is unconditionally called by this pointer.
Fix this bug by adding conditional return.

Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.


Yes , as dmitry wrote, this should be Reported-by.


It is an established practice for our project, you can find 700+ applied
patches with similar line:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/log/?qt=grep&q=linuxtesting.org

But rest LGTM.

Fixes: c929ac60b3ed ("drm/msm/dpu: allow just single IRQ callback")
Signed-off-by: Aleksandr Mishin <amishin@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_interrupts.c | 4 +++-
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_interrupts.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_interrupts.c
index 946dd0135dff..03a16fbd4c99 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_interrupts.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_interrupts.c
@@ -223,9 +223,11 @@ static void dpu_core_irq_callback_handler(struct dpu_kms *dpu_kms, unsigned int
      VERB("IRQ=[%d, %d]\n", DPU_IRQ_REG(irq_idx), DPU_IRQ_BIT(irq_idx));
-    if (!irq_entry->cb)
+    if (!irq_entry->cb) {
          DRM_ERROR("no registered cb, IRQ=[%d, %d]\n",
                DPU_IRQ_REG(irq_idx), DPU_IRQ_BIT(irq_idx));
+        return;
+    }
      atomic_inc(&irq_entry->count);

--
Kind regards
Aleksandr




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux