[PATCH] drm/msm/dpu: make error messages at dpu_core_irq_register_callback() more sensible

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



There is little point in using %ps to print a value known to be NULL. On
the other hand it makes sense to print the callback symbol in the
'invalid IRQ' message. Correct those two error messages to make more
sense.

Fixes: 6893199183f8 ("drm/msm/dpu: stop using raw IRQ indices in the kernel output")
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_interrupts.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_interrupts.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_interrupts.c
index 946dd0135dff..6a0a74832fb6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_interrupts.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_interrupts.c
@@ -525,14 +525,14 @@ int dpu_core_irq_register_callback(struct dpu_kms *dpu_kms,
 	int ret;
 
 	if (!irq_cb) {
-		DPU_ERROR("invalid IRQ=[%d, %d] irq_cb:%ps\n",
-			  DPU_IRQ_REG(irq_idx), DPU_IRQ_BIT(irq_idx), irq_cb);
+		DPU_ERROR("IRQ=[%d, %d] NULL callback\n",
+			  DPU_IRQ_REG(irq_idx), DPU_IRQ_BIT(irq_idx));
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
 	if (!dpu_core_irq_is_valid(irq_idx)) {
-		DPU_ERROR("invalid IRQ=[%d, %d]\n",
-			  DPU_IRQ_REG(irq_idx), DPU_IRQ_BIT(irq_idx));
+		DPU_ERROR("invalid IRQ=[%d, %d] irq_cb:%ps\n",
+			  DPU_IRQ_REG(irq_idx), DPU_IRQ_BIT(irq_idx), irq_cb);
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 

---
base-commit: 13ee4a7161b6fd938aef6688ff43b163f6d83e37
change-id: 20240330-dpu-irq-messages-5cf13fd7568c

Best regards,
-- 
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx>





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux