On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 at 23:36, Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On 3/28/2024 2:07 PM, Kuogee Hsieh wrote: > > Currently qmp_combo_dp_power_on() always return 0 in regardless of > > return value of cfg->configure_dp_phy(). This patch propagate > > return value of cfg->configure_dp_phy() all the way back to caller. > > > > This is good. But I am also thinking if we should add some prints in > this driver like it doesnt even tell where it failed like here > > > ret = qmp_v456_configure_dp_phy(qmp); > if (ret < 0) > return ret; > > > Signed-off-by: Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-combo.c | 5 +++-- > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > Also, I think we should have > > Fixes: 94a407cc17a4 ("phy: qcom-qmp: create copies of QMP PHY driver") > > If there is a better fixes tag for this, please let me know. Fixes: 52e013d0bffa ("phy: qcom-qmp: Add support for DP in USB3+DP combo phy") Otherwise LGTM > > > diff --git a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-combo.c b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-combo.c > > index 36632fa..884973a 100644 > > --- a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-combo.c > > +++ b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-combo.c > > @@ -2754,6 +2754,7 @@ static int qmp_combo_dp_power_on(struct phy *phy) > > const struct qmp_phy_cfg *cfg = qmp->cfg; > > void __iomem *tx = qmp->dp_tx; > > void __iomem *tx2 = qmp->dp_tx2; > > + int ret = 0; > > > > mutex_lock(&qmp->phy_mutex); > > > > @@ -2766,11 +2767,11 @@ static int qmp_combo_dp_power_on(struct phy *phy) > > cfg->configure_dp_tx(qmp); > > > > /* Configure link rate, swing, etc. */ > > - cfg->configure_dp_phy(qmp); > > + ret = cfg->configure_dp_phy(qmp); > > > > mutex_unlock(&qmp->phy_mutex); > > > > - return 0; > > + return ret; > > } > > > > static int qmp_combo_dp_power_off(struct phy *phy) -- With best wishes Dmitry