On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 02:16:20PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Some PCI devices must be powered-on before they can be detected on the
> bus. Introduce a simple framework reusing the existing PCI OF
> infrastructure.
>
> The way this works is: a DT node representing a PCI device connected to
> the port can be matched against its power control platform driver. If
> the match succeeds, the driver is responsible for powering-up the device
> and calling pcie_pwrctl_device_set_ready() which will trigger a PCI bus
> rescan as well as subscribe to PCI bus notifications.
>
> When the device is detected and created, we'll make it consume the same
> DT node that the platform device did. When the device is bound, we'll
> create a device link between it and the parent power control device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Bartosz,
some minor Kernel doc nits from my side.
...
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pwrctl/core.c b/drivers/pci/pwrctl/core.c
...
> +/**
> + * devm_pci_pwrctl_device_set_ready - Managed variant of
> + * pci_pwrctl_device_set_ready().
> + *
nit: @dev should be documented here
> + * @pwrctl: PCI power control data
> + *
> + * Returns:
> + * 0 on success, negative error number on error.
> + */
> +int devm_pci_pwrctl_device_set_ready(struct device *dev,
> + struct pci_pwrctl *pwrctl)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = pci_pwrctl_device_set_ready(pwrctl);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + return devm_add_action_or_reset(dev,
> + devm_pci_pwrctl_device_unset_ready,
> + pwrctl);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devm_pci_pwrctl_device_set_ready);
> +
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx>");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("PCI Device Power Control core driver");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> diff --git a/include/linux/pci-pwrctl.h b/include/linux/pci-pwrctl.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..ae8324ea7eeb
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/linux/pci-pwrctl.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2024 Linaro Ltd.
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef __PCI_PWRCTL_H__
> +#define __PCI_PWRCTL_H__
> +
> +#include <linux/notifier.h>
> +
> +struct device;
> +struct device_link;
> +
> +/*
> + * This is a simple framework for solving the issue of PCI devices that require
> + * certain resources (regulators, GPIOs, clocks) to be enabled before the
> + * device can actually be detected on the PCI bus.
> + *
> + * The idea is to reuse the platform bus to populate OF nodes describing the
> + * PCI device and its resources, let these platform devices probe and enable
> + * relevant resources and then trigger a rescan of the PCI bus allowing for the
> + * same device (with a second associated struct device) to be registered with
> + * the PCI subsystem.
> + *
> + * To preserve a correct hierarchy for PCI power management and device reset,
> + * we create a device link between the power control platform device (parent)
> + * and the supplied PCI device (child).
> + */
> +
> +/**
> + * struct pci_pwrctl - PCI device power control context.
> + * @dev - Address of the power controlling device.
nit: I think this should be "@dev: " rather than "@dev - "
As is, "./scripts/kernel-doc -none" complains.
> + *
> + * An object of this type must be allocated by the PCI power control device and
> + * passed to the pwrctl subsystem to trigger a bus rescan and setup a device
> + * link with the device once it's up.
> + */
> +struct pci_pwrctl {
> + struct device *dev;
> +
> + /* Private, don't use. */
I think Private needs to be followed by a ':' rather than a ',' to keep
kernel-doc happy.
> + struct notifier_block nb;
> + struct device_link *link;
> +};
> +
> +int pci_pwrctl_device_set_ready(struct pci_pwrctl *pwrctl);
> +void pci_pwrctl_device_unset_ready(struct pci_pwrctl *pwrctl);
> +int devm_pci_pwrctl_device_set_ready(struct device *dev,
> + struct pci_pwrctl *pwrctl);
> +
> +#endif /* __PCI_PWRCTL_H__ */
> --
> 2.40.1
>
>
