On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 05:09:03PM +0100, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 08:53:43PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > Move the pci_epc_clear_bar() and pci_epf_free_space() code to respective
> > helper functions. This allows reusing the helpers in future commits.
> >
> > This also requires moving the pci_epf_test_unbind() definition below
> > pci_epf_test_bind() to avoid forward declaration of the above helpers.
> >
> > No functional change.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++---------
> > 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> > index 1dae0fce8fc4..2fac36553633 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> > @@ -686,27 +686,6 @@ static void pci_epf_test_cmd_handler(struct work_struct *work)
> > msecs_to_jiffies(1));
> > }
> >
> > -static void pci_epf_test_unbind(struct pci_epf *epf)
> > -{
> > - struct pci_epf_test *epf_test = epf_get_drvdata(epf);
> > - struct pci_epc *epc = epf->epc;
> > - struct pci_epf_bar *epf_bar;
> > - int bar;
> > -
> > - cancel_delayed_work(&epf_test->cmd_handler);
> > - pci_epf_test_clean_dma_chan(epf_test);
> > - for (bar = 0; bar < PCI_STD_NUM_BARS; bar++) {
> > - epf_bar = &epf->bar[bar];
> > -
> > - if (epf_test->reg[bar]) {
> > - pci_epc_clear_bar(epc, epf->func_no, epf->vfunc_no,
> > - epf_bar);
> > - pci_epf_free_space(epf, epf_test->reg[bar], bar,
> > - PRIMARY_INTERFACE);
> > - }
> > - }
> > -}
> > -
> > static int pci_epf_test_set_bar(struct pci_epf *epf)
> > {
> > int bar, add;
> > @@ -746,6 +725,22 @@ static int pci_epf_test_set_bar(struct pci_epf *epf)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +static void pci_epf_test_clear_bar(struct pci_epf *epf)
> > +{
> > + struct pci_epf_test *epf_test = epf_get_drvdata(epf);
> > + struct pci_epc *epc = epf->epc;
> > + struct pci_epf_bar *epf_bar;
> > + int bar;
> > +
> > + for (bar = 0; bar < PCI_STD_NUM_BARS; bar++) {
> > + epf_bar = &epf->bar[bar];
> > +
> > + if (epf_test->reg[bar])
> > + pci_epc_clear_bar(epc, epf->func_no, epf->vfunc_no,
> > + epf_bar);
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > static int pci_epf_test_epc_init(struct pci_epf *epf)
> > {
> > struct pci_epf_test *epf_test = epf_get_drvdata(epf);
> > @@ -885,6 +880,22 @@ static int pci_epf_test_alloc_space(struct pci_epf *epf)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +static void pci_epf_test_free_space(struct pci_epf *epf)
> > +{
> > + struct pci_epf_test *epf_test = epf_get_drvdata(epf);
> > + struct pci_epf_bar *epf_bar;
> > + int bar;
> > +
> > + for (bar = 0; bar < PCI_STD_NUM_BARS; bar++) {
> > + epf_bar = &epf->bar[bar];
> > +
> > + if (epf_test->reg[bar]) {
> > + pci_epf_free_space(epf, epf_test->reg[bar], bar,
> > + PRIMARY_INTERFACE);
> > + }
>
> Nit: No need for braces here. (Just like you don't have braces in
> pci_epf_test_clear_bar()).
>
> Like you said in the other thread, this commit clashes with changes done
> in my series.
>
I think I should just rebase this series on top of yours.
> However, except for the small nit, the commit looks good:
> Reviewed-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
Thanks!
- Mani
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
