On Sat, Mar 23, 2024 at 01:29:00AM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > On 21.03.2024 05:31, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote: > > Unlike MSM platforms that manage NoC related clocks and scaling > > from RPM, IPQ SoCs dont involve RPM in managing NoC related > > clocks and there is no NoC scaling. > > > > However, there is a requirement to enable some NoC interface > > clocks for accessing the peripheral controllers present on > > these NoCs. > > > > Hence adding a minimalistic interconnect driver that can enable > > the relevant clocks. This is similar to msm8996-cbf's usage of > > icc-clk framework. > > > > Signed-off-by: Varadarajan Narayanan <quic_varada@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > [...] > > > @@ -9,9 +9,16 @@ > > #include <linux/of.h> > > #include <linux/platform_device.h> > > #include <linux/regmap.h> > > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INTERCONNECT) > > This is bad practice, especially given the reasoning for your changes. > > It's best if you add a dependency on interconnect to this driver, > otherwise things will go into uncountable EPROBE_DEFERs if there are > nodes consuming icc handles, but the supplier never registers. > > [...] > > > > > static int gcc_ipq9574_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > ..and that approach could save the probe func from the absolute mess it > has become with this patch > > Konrad Thanks for the feedback. Have addressed these and other reviewers comments and posted v2. Please take a look. -Varada