misc_cmd_type in exec_op have multiple problems. With commit a82990c8a409
("mtd: rawnand: qcom: Add read/read_start ops in exec_op path") it was
reworked and generalized but actually broke the handling of the
ERASE_BLOCK command.
Additional logic was added to the erase command cycle without clear
explaination causing the erase command to be broken on testing it on
a ipq806x nandc.
Fix the erase command by reverting the additional logic and only adding
the NAND_DEV0_CFG0 additional call (required for erase command).
Fixes: a82990c8a409 ("mtd: rawnand: qcom: Add read/read_start ops in exec_op path")
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@xxxxxxxxx>
---
Changes v2:
- Split this and rework commit description and title
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
index b079605c84d3..19d76e345a49 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
@@ -2830,9 +2830,8 @@ static int qcom_misc_cmd_type_exec(struct nand_chip *chip, const struct nand_sub
nandc_set_reg(chip, NAND_EXEC_CMD, 1);
write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_FLASH_CMD, instrs, NAND_BAM_NEXT_SGL);
- (q_op.cmd_reg == OP_BLOCK_ERASE) ? write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_DEV0_CFG0,
- 2, NAND_BAM_NEXT_SGL) : read_reg_dma(nandc,
- NAND_FLASH_STATUS, 1, NAND_BAM_NEXT_SGL);
+ if (q_op.cmd_reg == OP_BLOCK_ERASE)
+ write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_DEV0_CFG0, 2, NAND_BAM_NEXT_SGL);
write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_EXEC_CMD, 1, NAND_BAM_NEXT_SGL);
read_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_FLASH_STATUS, 1, NAND_BAM_NEXT_SGL);
--
2.43.0
