Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: PCIe fixes and GICv3 ITS enable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 02:10:21PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 05:54:16PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 11:25:48AM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > > As I mentioned, the 'required-opps' binding update is needed to
> > > fix the missing OPP vote so blocking the binding patch would
> > > block merging the DT fix which could otherwise go into 6.8.
> > I agree that the fix gets the priority. But some maintainers
> > perfer to merge fix patches _only_ if they are fixing the issue
> > introduced in the ongoing release.  But if Bjorn has no issues in
> > merging these for 6.8, then it is fine.

I do prefer to merge only regression and important fixes after the
merge window, so I want to be able to provide justification.

> It also depends on the severity of the issue and to some extent the
> complexity of the fix. These binding fixes are certainly low risk.
> :)

IIUC we're talking about:

  arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: add missing PCIe minimum OPP
  dt-bindings: PCI: qcom: Allow 'required-opps'

These don't look like a regression fix (correct me if I'm wrong), and
I can't tell whether they fix a user-visible problem, since
sc8280xp.dtsi does already contain 'required-opps' for ufs_mem_hc,
usb_0, and usb_1, which are mentioned in the commit log as covering up
the issue.

If these patches wait until v6.9, what badness ensues?


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux