Re: [PATCH v7 3/7] PCI: qcom: Add ICC bandwidth vote for CPU to PCIe path

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 08:43:53PM +0530, Krishna Chaitanya Chundru wrote:
> On 2/28/2024 7:09 PM, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 12:08:37PM +0530, Krishna Chaitanya Chundru wrote:
> > 
> > > We have limit up to 100 columns in the driver right, I am ok to change
> > > to 80 but just checking if I misunderstood something.
> > 
> > Please take a look at Documentation/process/coding-style.rst, which
> > clearly states:
> > 
> > 	The preferred limit on the length of a single line is 80
> > 	columns.
> > 
> > 	Statements longer than 80 columns should be broken into sensible
> > 	chunks, unless exceeding 80 columns significantly increases
> > 	readability and does not hide information.
> > 
> > So generally you should stay within 80 columns, unless not doing so
> > *significantly* increases readability. (And note that making such
> > decisions requires human judgement, which is why checkpatch now only
> > warns about lines longer than 100 chars.)
> ok got it Johan, As checkpatch is not reporting any warnings or errors
> for I misunderstood this. I will correct the comments to fit in 80 columns
> in my next series.

Yeah, checkpatch is great and useful, but the bottom line is that it's
a tool that helps keep things relatively consistent, and a lot of that
consistency just comes down to paying attention to all the surrounding
code so the result looks coherent instead of a hodgepodge.


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux