On 24/02/16 11:04PM, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> In order to add support for Hyper DMA (HDMA), let's refactor the existing
> dw_pcie_edma_find_chip() API by moving the common code to separate
> functions.
>
> No functional change.
>
> Suggested-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
> index 250cf7f40b85..3a26dfc5368f 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
> @@ -880,7 +880,17 @@ static struct dw_edma_plat_ops dw_pcie_edma_ops = {
> .irq_vector = dw_pcie_edma_irq_vector,
> };
>
> -static int dw_pcie_edma_find_chip(struct dw_pcie *pci)
> +static void dw_pcie_edma_init_data(struct dw_pcie *pci)
> +{
> + pci->edma.dev = pci->dev;
> +
> + if (!pci->edma.ops)
> + pci->edma.ops = &dw_pcie_edma_ops;
> +
> + pci->edma.flags |= DW_EDMA_CHIP_LOCAL;
> +}
> +
> +static int dw_pcie_edma_find_mf(struct dw_pcie *pci)
> {
> u32 val;
>
> @@ -902,8 +912,6 @@ static int dw_pcie_edma_find_chip(struct dw_pcie *pci)
>
> if (val == 0xFFFFFFFF && pci->edma.reg_base) {
> pci->edma.mf = EDMA_MF_EDMA_UNROLL;
> -
> - val = dw_pcie_readl_dma(pci, PCIE_DMA_CTRL);
> } else if (val != 0xFFFFFFFF) {
> pci->edma.mf = EDMA_MF_EDMA_LEGACY;
Minor suggestion:
The above section prior to this patch was:
if (val == 0xFFFFFFFF && pci->edma.reg_base) {
pci->edma.mf = EDMA_MF_EDMA_UNROLL;
val = dw_pcie_readl_dma(pci, PCIE_DMA_CTRL);
} else if (val != 0xFFFFFFFF) {
pci->edma.mf = EDMA_MF_EDMA_LEGACY;
pci->edma.reg_base = pci->dbi_base + PCIE_DMA_VIEWPORT_BASE;
} else {
return -ENODEV;
}
And this patch is removing the call to dw_pcie_readl_dma() in the "if"
condition above. So the curly braces after this patch will only be
present because of the "else if" statement. So is the following change a
good idea?
/* Assume it is EDMA_LEGACY by default but update it later if needed */
pci->edma.mf = EDMA_MF_EDMA_LEGACY;
if (val == 0xFFFFFFFF && pci->edma.reg_base)
pci->edma.mf = EDMA_MF_EDMA_UNROLL;
else if (val != 0xFFFFFFFF)
pci->edma.reg_base = pci->dbi_base + PCIE_DMA_VIEWPORT_BASE;
else
return -ENODEV;
Regards,
Siddharth.
