Re: [RFC PATCH 5/6] arm64: dts: qcom: add base AIM500 dtsi

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 2/20/2024 6:06 PM, Jingyi Wang wrote:
Hi Dmitry,

On 2/20/2024 5:19 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 at 11:17, Jingyi Wang <quic_jingyw@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Dmitry,

On 2/5/2024 10:23 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Mon, 5 Feb 2024 at 14:00, Jingyi Wang <quic_jingyw@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Introduce aim500 board dtsi.

So, is it a board or a module?

aim500 is a module, will fix the descrption.


AIM500 Series is a highly optimized family of modules designed to
support AIoT and Generative AI applications based on sm8650p with
PMIC and bluetooth functions etc.

Co-developed-by: Tingwei Zhang <quic_tingweiz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Tingwei Zhang <quic_tingweiz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jingyi Wang <quic_jingyw@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8650p-aim500.dtsi | 409 +++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 409 insertions(+)
  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8650p-aim500.dtsi

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8650p-aim500.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8650p-aim500.dtsi
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..cb857da8653b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8650p-aim500.dtsi
@@ -0,0 +1,409 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2024, Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved.
+ */
+
+#include <dt-bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.h>
+#include "sm8650p.dtsi"
+#include "pm8550.dtsi"
+#include "pm8550b.dtsi"
+#define PMK8550VE_SID 8
+#include "pm8550ve.dtsi"
+#include "pm8550vs.dtsi"
+#include "pmk8550.dtsi"
+
+/ {
+       aliases {
+               serial1 = &uart14;
+       };
+
+       vph_pwr: vph-pwr-regulator { };

Is this regulator a part of the module or a part of the carrier board?
If the latter is true, this must go to the carrier board DT file.


the vph_pwr regulator is defined in the aim500-aiot carrier board and used
in aim500 module.

If it is defined in the carrier board, then please move it and
corresponding supply entries to the carrier board dts. Other devices
using the SoM can have different power tree.

While we are at it, could you please rename the node to regulator-vph-pwr?


will rename the node and move it to sm8650p-aim500-aiot.dts

Shall we have the VPH_PWR implementation inside the board dts file, and have the supply entries which used the VPH_PWR inside the SOM.dtsi file?

The VPH_PWR is an input IO of SOM. And the corresponding supply entries is inside the SOM hardware design as well.

The VPH_PWR as a fixed regulator implementation is the board design, it can be changed to other design from different boards.

Here is a simple diagram to show the hardware description of the VPH_PWR related design:

+------------------------------------------------------+

| Board |

| |

| +-----------------+ |

|power----->| Fixed regulator-----------+ |

| +-----------------+ | |

| | |

| v VPH_PWR |

| +------|----------------------+ |

| | | SOM | | |

| | | | | |

| | vVPH_PWR vVPM_PWR| |

| | +------+ +------+ | |

| | | pmic1| |pmic2 | | |

| | +------+ +------+ | |

| | | |

| +-----------------------------+ |

+------------------------------------------------------+




Thanks,
Jingyi

--
Thx and BRs,
Aiqun(Maria) Yu




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux