On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 02:30:34PM +0000, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
>
>
> On 12/01/16 13:59, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >On Tuesday 12 January 2016 13:46:32 Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> >> };
> >>
> >>+ smd {
> >>+ rpm {
> >>+ rpm-requests {
> >>+ pm8916-regulators {
> >>+
> >>+ vdd_l1_l2_l3-supply = <&pm8916_s3>;
> >>+ vdd_l5-supply = <&pm8916_s3>;
> >>+ vdd_l4_l5_l6-supply = <&pm8916_s4>;
> >>+ vdd_l7-supply = <&pm8916_s4>;
> >>+
> >>
> >
> >If you're nested this deeply, you should consider using labels, e.g.
> >
> Labels are good and works for me.
>
> Stephen/Andy are you ok to use labels for such deeply nested nodes in board
> dts?
I tend to agree with Arnd. I am ok with using labels.
<snip>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
