On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 at 11:29, Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 15/02/2024 10:25, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > > On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 at 11:20, Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> Document the GPU SMMU found on the SM8650 platform. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml | 7 +++++-- > >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml > >> index a4042ae24770..3ad5c850f3bf 100644 > >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml > >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml > >> @@ -93,6 +93,7 @@ properties: > >> - qcom,sm8350-smmu-500 > >> - qcom,sm8450-smmu-500 > >> - qcom,sm8550-smmu-500 > >> + - qcom,sm8650-smmu-500 > >> - const: qcom,adreno-smmu > >> - const: qcom,smmu-500 > >> - const: arm,mmu-500 > >> @@ -508,7 +509,10 @@ allOf: > >> - if: > >> properties: > >> compatible: > >> - const: qcom,sm8550-smmu-500 > >> + contains: > >> + enum: > >> + - qcom,sm8550-smmu-500 > >> + - qcom,sm8650-smmu-500 > > > > Doesn't this cause warnings for non-GPU SMMU on this platform? > > No because it doesn't add those to required, it simply allows clock the properties. Can we further constrain this branch so that it is applicable only to the Adreno SMMUs (and enforce requirement)? And maybe constrain the second if-branch so that it doesn't apply to the Adreno SMMUs? > > > > >> then: > >> properties: > >> clock-names: > >> @@ -544,7 +548,6 @@ allOf: > >> - qcom,sdx65-smmu-500 > >> - qcom,sm6350-smmu-500 > >> - qcom,sm6375-smmu-500 > >> - - qcom,sm8650-smmu-500 > >> - qcom,x1e80100-smmu-500 > >> then: > >> properties: > >> > >> -- > >> 2.34.1 > >> > > > > > -- With best wishes Dmitry
