On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 10:33:19PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > On 12.02.2024 22:32, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > "Properly" is a noise word that suggests "we're doing it right this > > time" but doesn't hint at what actually makes this better. > > > > On Sat, Feb 10, 2024 at 06:10:07PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > >> Currently, we've only been minimizing the power draw while keeping the > >> RC up at all times. This is suboptimal, as it draws a whole lot of power > >> and prevents the SoC from power collapsing. > > > > Is "power collapse" a technical term specific to this device, or is > > there some more common term that could be used? I assume the fact > > that the RC remains powered precludes some lower power state of the > > entire SoC? > > That's spot on, "power collapse" commonly refers to shutting down as many > parts of the SoC as possible, in order to achieve miliwatt-order power draw. I'm pretty sure "power collapse" is a Qualcomm:ism so better to use common terminology as Bjorn suggested, and maybe put the Qualcomm wording in parenthesis or similar. Johan
