On Sun, Feb 04, 2024 at 06:56:35PM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> The idea impressed in the commit b32e592d3c28 ("devicetree: bindings:
> Document qcom board compatible format") never got actually adopted. As
> can be seen from the existing board DT files, no device actually used
> the PMIC / foundry / version parts of the compatible string. Drop this
> compatibility string description to avoid possible confusion and keep
> just the generic terms and the SoC list.
>
> Fixes: b32e592d3c28 ("devicetree: bindings: Document qcom board compatible format")
FWIW: It's not correct that no device uses the version parts of the
compatible string. There are actually two boards documented in qcom.yaml
that follow this scheme:
compatible = "qcom,msm8916-mtp", "qcom,msm8916-mtp/1", "qcom,msm8916";
compatible = "longcheer,l8150", "qcom,msm8916-v1-qrd/9-v1", "qcom,msm8916";
I don't think anyone is actively relying on those, though. I guess we
can just ignore them or even remove them.
Thanks,
Stephan
