Re: [PATCH v3 05/24] media: i2c: switch to use of_graph_get_next_device_endpoint()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Feb 04, 2024 at 11:44:39PM +0000, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
> 
> Hi Rob
> 
> > This is assuming there's just 1 port and 1 endpoint, but let's be 
> > specific as the bindings are (first endpoint on port 0):
> > 
> > of_graph_get_endpoint_by_regs(client->dev.of_node, 0, -1);
> > 
> > Note we could ask for endpoint 0 here, but the bindings generally allow 
> > for more than 1.
> > 
> > I imagine most of the other cases here are the same.
> 
> I will do it on new patch-set
> 
> > > -	for_each_endpoint_of_node(state->dev->of_node, ep_np) {
> > > +	for_each_device_endpoint_of_node(state->dev->of_node, ep_np) {
> > 
> > I would skip the rename.
> 
> It is needed to avoid confuse, because new function will add
> another endpoint loop.
> 
> see
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131100701.754a95ee@booty

I've read the threads already and think you should skip the rename. Just 
put 'port' in the name of the new one. That and taking a port number 
param should be enough distinction.

Rob




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux