On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 09:13:25AM +0100, neil.armstrong@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On 01/02/2024 20:20, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> > On 29.01.2024 12:10, Abel Vesa wrote:
> > > Add the compatible and the driver data for X1E80100.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c | 1 +
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> > > index 10f2d0bb86be..2a6000e457bc 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> > > @@ -1642,6 +1642,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id qcom_pcie_match[] = {
> > > { .compatible = "qcom,pcie-sm8450-pcie0", .data = &cfg_1_9_0 },
> > > { .compatible = "qcom,pcie-sm8450-pcie1", .data = &cfg_1_9_0 },
> > > { .compatible = "qcom,pcie-sm8550", .data = &cfg_1_9_0 },
> > > + { .compatible = "qcom,pcie-x1e80100", .data = &cfg_1_9_0 },
> >
> > I swear I'm not delaying everything related to x1 on purpose..
> >
> > But..
> >
> > Would a "qcom,pcie-v1.9.0" generic match string be a good idea?
>
> Yes as fallback, this is why I used qcom,pcie-sm8550 as fallback for SM8650.
>
Right. Fallback should be used here also.
- Mani
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
