On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 11:48:03AM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 1/26/24 11:00, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 12:31:06AM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> >> On 1/19/24 00:00, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> >
> >>> + gpu-thermal {
> >>> + polling-delay-passive = <250>;
> >>> + polling-delay = <1000>;
> >>
> >> Hm, did tsens only gain support of non-polled reporting with 8450?
> >>
> >> If not, we should definitely update all the relevant SoCs.
> >
> > Did you determine whether the interrupts work as expected?
>
> Yes, they seem to!
Excellent.
> > We don't want to be polling here unless we have to (i.e. polling-delay
> > should be 0 as per the binding).
>
> Even better:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240125-topic-thermal-v1-0-3c9d4dced138@xxxxxxxxxx/
I'm not sure that's better, but either way we want to set
'polling-delay' to zero here as we don't want to have to wait for that
binding and driver update to hit mainline in 6.9-rc1 before merging this
patch.
> Believe me, I'm not omitting you from Cc on purpose.. I usually
> realize I forgot right after pressing enter on "do you really
> wanna send"..
Heh. No worries.
Johan
