On 25/01/2024 14:25, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> interrupt-map = <0 0 0 1 &intc 0 434 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>, /* int_a */
>>> @@ -2349,8 +2357,16 @@ pcie2: pcie@1c10000 {
>>> ranges = <0x01000000 0x0 0x00000000 0x0 0x64200000 0x0 0x100000>,
>>> <0x02000000 0x0 0x64300000 0x0 0x64300000 0x0 0x3d00000>;
>>>
>>> - interrupts = <GIC_SPI 243 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>>> - interrupt-names = "msi";
>>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 243 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> + <GIC_SPI 261 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> + <GIC_SPI 262 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> + <GIC_SPI 263 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> + <GIC_SPI 264 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> + <GIC_SPI 278 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> + <GIC_SPI 288 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>> + <GIC_SPI 289 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>>> + interrupt-names = "msi0", "msi1", "msi2", "msi3",
>>> + "msi4", "msi5", "msi6", "msi7";
>>
>> This part looks a bit suspicious. All other platforms have these
>> interrupts in a continuous range.
>
> Hmm, pcie1 interrupts are also not contiguous. Okay, fine then:
>
Yeah, the other case has even two gaps.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
