On 1/23/2024 9:18 AM, Conor Dooley wrote: > On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 12:50:07PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 22/01/2024 11:10, Amrit Anand wrote: >>> >>> On 1/21/2024 12:40 AM, Trilok Soni wrote: >>>> On 1/20/2024 3:20 AM, Amrit Anand wrote: >>>>> From: Elliot Berman <quic_eberman@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> >>>>> Device manufacturers frequently ship multiple boards or SKUs under a >>>>> single software package. These software packages will ship multiple >>>>> devicetree blobs and require some mechanism to pick the correct DTB for >>>>> the board the software package was deployed. Introduce a common >>>>> definition for adding board identifiers to device trees. board-id >>>>> provides a mechanism for bootloaders to select the appropriate DTB which >>>>> is vendor/OEM-agnostic. >>>> Please extend CC list to more architectures? linux-arm-kernel, risc-v etc; since >>>> the proposal below is not specific to ARM but any architecture is using the >>>> devicetree. >>> Wouldn't devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx will have concern folks from all the >>> architectures? >>> Please correct me. >> >> No. > > The chromium guys should get a CC on future versions of this stuff, > since they like doing wacky things with compatible strings in their > bootloader and this problem is one they also face. Doug Anderson and the > mediatek chromebook folks would be a good start. > Please CC Peter Griffin from Linaro as he helped restart this discussion at Plumbers. Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@xxxxxxxxxx> Also, for the oneplus boards: Caleb Connolly <caleb.connolly@xxxxxxxxxx>
