On 1/23/24 17:34, Satya Priya Kakitapalli wrote:
Add active_only support for gcc_parents_0, this is needed because some of the clocks under it are critical which would vote on xo blocking the suspend. Signed-off-by: Satya Priya Kakitapalli <quic_skakitap@xxxxxxxxxxx> ---
Is there a need to keep gcc_cpuss_ahb_clk_src around? Do we do any ratesetting on it? Should we ever turn it off? Konrad
