On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 at 16:39, Odelu Kukatla <quic_okukatla@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Add clock handles for required clocks to be enabled for
> configuring QoS on sc7280.
>
> Change-Id: I58991300ff1d8d2865763d4e79ee81c03586249e
> Signed-off-by: Odelu Kukatla <quic_okukatla@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
> index 83b5b76ba179..73acf1bd0f97 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
> @@ -2099,6 +2099,8 @@
> reg = <0 0x016e0000 0 0x1c080>;
> #interconnect-cells = <2>;
> qcom,bcm-voters = <&apps_bcm_voter>;
> + clocks = <&gcc GCC_AGGRE_UFS_PHY_AXI_CLK>,
> + <&gcc GCC_AGGRE_USB3_PRIM_AXI_CLK>;
> };
>
> aggre2_noc: interconnect@1700000 {
> @@ -2106,6 +2108,7 @@
> compatible = "qcom,sc7280-aggre2-noc";
> #interconnect-cells = <2>;
> qcom,bcm-voters = <&apps_bcm_voter>;
> + clocks = <&rpmhcc RPMH_IPA_CLK>;
Is there any reason to write QoS for the IPA before the IPA starts
poking around? The same question applies to aggre1 NoC.
> };
>
> mmss_noc: interconnect@1740000 {
> --
> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
>
>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
