Re: [RFC][PATCH] misc: Introduce reboot_reason driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Bjorn Andersson
<bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue 08 Dec 13:29 PST 2015, John Stultz wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064-nexus7-flo.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064-nexus7-flo.dts
>> index 5183d18..ee5dcb7 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064-nexus7-flo.dts
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064-nexus7-flo.dts
>> @@ -282,6 +282,15 @@
>>                       };
>>               };
>>
>> +             reboot_reason: reboot_reason@2a03f65c {
>> +                     compatible              = "reboot_reason";
>> +                     reg                     = <0x2A03F65C 0x4>;
>> +                     reason,none             = <0x77665501>;
>> +                     reason,bootloader       = <0x77665500>;
>> +                     reason,recovery         = <0x77665502>;
>> +                     reason,oem              = <0x6f656d00>;
>> +             };
>> +
>
> This address refers to IMEM, which is shared with a number of other
> uses. So I think we should have a simple-mfd (and syscon) with this
> within.

So talking with Arnd some more it looked like IMEM was really just
SRAM. Is that not the case, or is there something else special about
it?  Does it really need simple-mfd and syscon? I'm still fuzzy on how
to use those for this.

>> +     /* initialize specified reasons from DT */
>> +     if (!of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node, "reason,none", &val))
>> +             reasons[NONE] = val;
>> +     if (!of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node, "reason,bootloader", &val))
>> +             reasons[BOOTLOADER] = val;
>> +     if (!of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node, "reason,recovery", &val))
>> +             reasons[RECOVERY] = val;
>> +     if (!of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node, "reason,oem", &val))
>> +             reasons[OEM] = val;
>
> I would like for this to be less hard coded.

So thinking of this more. Is having something like:

cmds = "default", "bootloader", "recovery";
vals  = <0xmagic1>, <0xmagic2>, <0xmagic3>;

what you're thinking about?

This wouldn't quite handle the "oem-N" options as simply, but they
could define each oem- case explicitly in the DT to support it.

thanks
-john
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux