On 16/01/2024 06:45, Mao Jinlong wrote:
Remove pattern match of ETE node name. Use ete with the number as the name for ete nodes. Signed-off-by: Mao Jinlong <quic_jinlmao@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- .../bindings/arm/arm,embedded-trace-extension.yaml | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,embedded-trace-extension.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,embedded-trace-extension.yaml index f725e6940993..ed78cc7ae94a 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,embedded-trace-extension.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,embedded-trace-extension.yaml @@ -22,8 +22,6 @@ description: | with any optional connection graph as per the coresight bindings.properties:- $nodename: - pattern: "^ete([0-9a-f]+)$" compatible: items: - const: arm,embedded-trace-extension @@ -55,13 +53,13 @@ examples:# An ETE node without legacy CoreSight connections- | - ete0 { + ete-0 {
Why do we need the number ? why not simply "ete" as Krzysztof suggested ? Suzuki
