On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 6:55 AM, Tim Bird <tim.bird@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 12/08/2015 08:11 PM, Rob Herring wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 04:40:16PM -0800, Tim Bird wrote: >>> Add a binding for the regulator which controls the OTG chargepath switch. >>> The OTG switch gets its power from pm8941_5vs1, and that should be >>> expressed as a usb-otg-in-supply property in the DT node for the >>> charger driver. The regulator name is "otg". [...] >>> +child nodes: >>> +- otg: >>> + Usage: optional >>> + Description: This node defines a regulator used to control the direction >>> + of VBUS voltage - specifically: whether to supply voltage >>> + to VBUS for host mode operation of the OTG port, or allow >>> + input voltage from external VBUS for charging. In the >>> + hardware, the supply for this regulator comes from >>> + usb-otg-in-supply. >> >> Doesn't this regulator need to have a name defined? > > I'm not sure what you mean. The regulator name is "otg", defined by the DT node > name. The code requires that the DT node name be "otg", and defines a regulator > with the same name. > > As far as I know, you have to define a DT label for the node, in order > to reference this regulator with a phandle. Is that what you are referring to? > I usually use "chg_otg" as the label. Are you asking that this be reflected > in the example? You need a regulator-name property. Also, should should define valid values for regulator-min-microvolt and regulator-max-microvolt. Thinking about this some more, the node name should be generic, so just "regulator". The label does not need to be generic. Rob -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
