Re: [PATCH] drm/ci: Add msm tests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 3:42 AM Vignesh Raman
<vignesh.raman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Rob,
>
>
> On 09/01/24 01:20, Rob Clark wrote:
> > From: Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > The msm tests should skip on non-msm hw, so I think it should be safe to
> > enable everywhere.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/ci/testlist.txt | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >   1 file changed, 49 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ci/testlist.txt b/drivers/gpu/drm/ci/testlist.txt
> > index f82cd90372f4..eaeb751bb0ad 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ci/testlist.txt
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ci/testlist.txt
> > @@ -2910,3 +2910,52 @@ kms_writeback@writeback-invalid-parameters
> >   kms_writeback@writeback-fb-id
> >   kms_writeback@writeback-check-output
> >   prime_mmap_kms@buffer-sharing
> > +msm_shrink@copy-gpu-sanitycheck-8
> > +msm_shrink@copy-gpu-sanitycheck-32
> > +msm_shrink@copy-gpu-8
> > +msm_shrink@copy-gpu-32
> > +msm_shrink@copy-gpu-madvise-8
> > +msm_shrink@copy-gpu-madvise-32
> > +msm_shrink@copy-gpu-oom-8
> > +msm_shrink@copy-gpu-oom-32
> > +msm_shrink@copy-mmap-sanitycheck-8
> > +msm_shrink@copy-mmap-sanitycheck-32
> > +msm_shrink@copy-mmap-8
> > +msm_shrink@copy-mmap-32
> > +msm_shrink@copy-mmap-madvise-8
> > +msm_shrink@copy-mmap-madvise-32
> > +msm_shrink@copy-mmap-oom-8
> > +msm_shrink@copy-mmap-oom-32
> > +msm_shrink@copy-mmap-dmabuf-sanitycheck-8
> > +msm_shrink@copy-mmap-dmabuf-sanitycheck-32
> > +msm_shrink@copy-mmap-dmabuf-8
> > +msm_shrink@copy-mmap-dmabuf-32
> > +msm_shrink@copy-mmap-dmabuf-madvise-8
> > +msm_shrink@copy-mmap-dmabuf-madvise-32
> > +msm_shrink@copy-mmap-dmabuf-oom-8
> > +msm_shrink@copy-mmap-dmabuf-oom-32
> > +msm_mapping@ring
> > +msm_mapping@sqefw
> > +msm_mapping@shadow
> > +msm_submitoverhead@submitbench-10-bos
> > +msm_submitoverhead@submitbench-10-bos-no-implicit-sync
> > +msm_submitoverhead@submitbench-100-bos
> > +msm_submitoverhead@submitbench-100-bos-no-implicit-sync
> > +msm_submitoverhead@submitbench-250-bos
> > +msm_submitoverhead@submitbench-250-bos-no-implicit-sync
> > +msm_submitoverhead@submitbench-500-bos
> > +msm_submitoverhead@submitbench-500-bos-no-implicit-sync
> > +msm_submitoverhead@submitbench-1000-bos
> > +msm_submitoverhead@submitbench-1000-bos-no-implicit-sync
> > +msm_recovery@hangcheck
> > +msm_recovery@gpu-fault
> > +msm_recovery@gpu-fault-parallel
> > +msm_recovery@iova-fault
> > +msm_submit@empty-submit
> > +msm_submit@invalid-queue-submit
> > +msm_submit@invalid-flags-submit
> > +msm_submit@invalid-in-fence-submit
> > +msm_submit@invalid-duplicate-bo-submit
> > +msm_submit@invalid-cmd-idx-submit
> > +msm_submit@invalid-cmd-type-submit
> > +msm_submit@valid-submit
>
> I tested this patch with latest drm-misc/drm-misc-next and there was
> some failures seen for the newly added msm tests. I have updated the
> xfails with below commit,
>
> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/vigneshraman/linux/-/commit/d012893597a661d6ebbb755bf2607dfb055524a1
>
> I will notify the maintainers about the flaky tests, update the url in
> the flakes.txt, and submit a separate patch for this change.

Thanks, it looks like you also have a relatively recent igt (there
were some msm_submit fails until I fixed the test)..

BR,
-R

> Regards,
> Vignesh





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux