Re: [PATCH 09/18] clk: qcom: gcc-sm8250: Set delay for Venus CLK resets

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 1/9/24 01:34, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
On 08/01/2024 12:32, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
Some Venus resets may require more time when toggling. Describe that.

May or does ?

I'd prefer a strong declaration of where this value came from and why its being added.

May is ambiguous.

"Downstream has a 150 us delay for this. My own testing shows this to be necessary in upstream"

Alright


Later commits want to add a 1000 us delay. Have all of these delays been tested ?

No, we don't support Venus on many of the newer SoCs..



If not please describe where the values come.

They come from the downstream Venus driver as you mentioned.
I checked a couple different downstream SoC kernel trees and
tried to assign the values based on what I found in a kernel
for that platform. Some are fairly educated guesses.

Konrad




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux