On Fri, Dec 29, 2023 at 10:37:56PM +0100, Luca Weiss wrote:
> On Freitag, 29. Dezember 2023 21:29:54 CET David Heidelberg wrote:
> > Reported by: `make CHECK_DTBS=1 qcom/sdm845-oneplus-enchilada.dtb`
> >
> > Signed-off-by: David Heidelberg <david@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
> > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi index c2244824355a..ad8677b62bfb
> > 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
> > @@ -2644,6 +2644,8 @@ ufs_mem_phy: phy@1d87000 {
> > clocks = <&gcc GCC_UFS_MEM_CLKREF_CLK>,
> > <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_PHY_AUX_CLK>;
> >
> > + power-domains = <&gcc UFS_PHY_GDSC>;
> > +
> > resets = <&ufs_mem_hc 0>;
> > reset-names = "ufsphy";
>
> This is potentially the wrong power domain, see the conversation here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20231204172829.GA69580@thinkpad/
>
Yes, GDSCs are the power domain of the controllers, not PHYs. This applies to
other peripherals such as USB, PCIe etc...
- Mani
> Hopefully Mani can give some input here :)
>
> Regards
> Luca
>
>
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
