Re: [PATCH] regulator: qcom_smd: Keep one rpm handle for all vregs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 27/12/2023 03:29, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
For no apparent reason (as there's just one RPM per SoC), all vregs
currently store a copy of a pointer to smd_rpm. Introduce a single,
global one to save up on space in each definition.

bloat-o-meter reports:

Total: Before=43944, After=43924, chg -0.05%

plus sizeof(ptr) on every dynamically allocated regulator :)

Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/regulator/qcom_smd-regulator.c | 18 +++++++-----------
  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/qcom_smd-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/qcom_smd-regulator.c
index d1be9568025e..905c15df8c85 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/qcom_smd-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/qcom_smd-regulator.c
@@ -11,11 +11,10 @@
  #include <linux/regulator/of_regulator.h>
  #include <linux/soc/qcom/smd-rpm.h>
+struct qcom_smd_rpm *smd_vreg_rpm;
+
  struct qcom_rpm_reg {
  	struct device *dev;
-
-	struct qcom_smd_rpm *rpm;
-
  	u32 type;
  	u32 id;
@@ -70,7 +69,7 @@ static int rpm_reg_write_active(struct qcom_rpm_reg *vreg)
  	if (!reqlen)
  		return 0;
- ret = qcom_rpm_smd_write(vreg->rpm, QCOM_SMD_RPM_ACTIVE_STATE,
+	ret = qcom_rpm_smd_write(smd_vreg_rpm, QCOM_SMD_RPM_ACTIVE_STATE,
  				 vreg->type, vreg->id,
  				 req, sizeof(req[0]) * reqlen);
  	if (!ret) {
@@ -1391,7 +1390,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, rpm_of_match);
   * Return: 0 on success, errno on failure
   */
  static int rpm_regulator_init_vreg(struct qcom_rpm_reg *vreg, struct device *dev,
-				   struct device_node *node, struct qcom_smd_rpm *rpm,
+				   struct device_node *node,
  				   const struct rpm_regulator_data *pmic_rpm_data)
  {
  	struct regulator_config config = {};
@@ -1409,7 +1408,6 @@ static int rpm_regulator_init_vreg(struct qcom_rpm_reg *vreg, struct device *dev
  	}
vreg->dev = dev;
-	vreg->rpm	= rpm;
  	vreg->type	= rpm_data->type;
  	vreg->id	= rpm_data->id;
@@ -1440,11 +1438,10 @@ static int rpm_reg_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
  	const struct rpm_regulator_data *vreg_data;
  	struct device_node *node;
  	struct qcom_rpm_reg *vreg;
-	struct qcom_smd_rpm *rpm;
  	int ret;
- rpm = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);
-	if (!rpm) {
+	smd_vreg_rpm = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);
+	if (!smd_vreg_rpm) {

I thought about having a mutex around (I don't remember if secondary PMICs and/or chargers can be routed through RPM or not).

Then I went on checking other RPM and SMD-RPM drivers.

clk-rpm: global variable, field
clk-smd-rpm: struct field
regulator_qcom-smd-rpm: struct field

Probably it's worth using the same approach in all four drivers?

  		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Unable to retrieve handle to rpm\n");
  		return -ENODEV;
  	}
@@ -1460,8 +1457,7 @@ static int rpm_reg_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
  			return -ENOMEM;
  		}
- ret = rpm_regulator_init_vreg(vreg, dev, node, rpm, vreg_data);
-
+		ret = rpm_regulator_init_vreg(vreg, dev, node, vreg_data);
  		if (ret < 0) {
  			of_node_put(node);
  			return ret;

---
base-commit: 39676dfe52331dba909c617f213fdb21015c8d10
change-id: 20231227-topic-rpm_vreg_cleanup-fa095cd528ec

Best regards,

--
With best wishes
Dmitry





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux