On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 05:27:40PM +0900, Chanwoo Lee wrote:
> From: ChanWoo Lee <cw9316.lee@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> There is only one place where goto is used,
> and it is unnecessary to check the ret value through 'goto out'
> because the ret value is already true.
>
> Therefore, remove the goto statement and
> integrate the '!ret' condition into the existing code.
>
> Signed-off-by: ChanWoo Lee <cw9316.lee@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Mani
> ---
> drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c | 7 ++-----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
> index 17e24270477d..8cf803806326 100644
> --- a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
> +++ b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
> @@ -1929,7 +1929,7 @@ static int ufs_qcom_config_esi(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> ufs_qcom_write_msi_msg);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(hba->dev, "Failed to request Platform MSI %d\n", ret);
> - goto out;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> msi_lock_descs(hba->dev);
> @@ -1964,11 +1964,8 @@ static int ufs_qcom_config_esi(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> REG_UFS_CFG3);
> }
> ufshcd_mcq_enable_esi(hba);
> - }
> -
> -out:
> - if (!ret)
> host->esi_enabled = true;
> + }
>
> return ret;
> }
> --
> 2.29.0
>
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
