Re: [PATCH v2 07/10] clk: qcom: Add dispcc clock driver for x1e80100

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 14/12/2023 16:49, Abel Vesa wrote:
From: Rajendra Nayak <quic_rjendra@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Add the dispcc clock driver for x1e80100.

Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <quic_rjendra@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@xxxxxxxxxx>
---

+static struct platform_driver disp_cc_x1e80100_driver = {
+	.probe = disp_cc_x1e80100_probe,
+	.driver = {
+		.name = "disp_cc-x1e80100",
+		.of_match_table = disp_cc_x1e80100_match_table,
+	},
+};
+
+static int __init disp_cc_x1e80100_init(void)
+{
+	return platform_driver_register(&disp_cc_x1e80100_driver);
+}
+subsys_initcall(disp_cc_x1e80100_init);
+
+static void __exit disp_cc_x1e80100_exit(void)
+{
+	platform_driver_unregister(&disp_cc_x1e80100_driver);
+}
+module_exit(disp_cc_x1e80100_exit);
+
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("QTI DISPCC X1E80100 Driver");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");


And we don't even do the odd underscore insertion consistently. For whatever reason "DISPCC" instead of "DISP_CC"

Just to reiterate the underscores should be dropped from these clock controller names and defines entirely, they just eat up bytes in databases.

.name = "dispcc-x1e80100"

("QTI DISPCC X1E80100 Driver"); better but IMO we could just a complete word here

"Display Clock Controller" there's no need to abbreviate.

---
bod




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux