Hi Suraj
On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 05:28:41PM +0530, Suraj Jaiswal wrote:
> Add support to listen HW safety IRQ like ECC(error
> correction code), DPP(data path parity), FSM(finite state
> machine) fault in common IRQ line.
>
> Signed-off-by: Suraj Jaiswal <quic_jsuraj@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/common.h | 1 +
> drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h | 3 +++
> .../net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++
> .../ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c | 9 ++++++++
> 4 files changed, 34 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/common.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/common.h
> index 721c1f8e892f..b9233b09b80f 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/common.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/common.h
> @@ -344,6 +344,7 @@ enum request_irq_err {
> REQ_IRQ_ERR_ALL,
> REQ_IRQ_ERR_TX,
> REQ_IRQ_ERR_RX,
> + REQ_IRQ_ERR_SFTY,
> REQ_IRQ_ERR_SFTY_UE,
> REQ_IRQ_ERR_SFTY_CE,
> REQ_IRQ_ERR_LPI,
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h
> index 9f89acf31050..ca3d93851bed 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h
> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ struct stmmac_resources {
> int wol_irq;
> int lpi_irq;
> int irq;
> + int sfty_irq;
> int sfty_ce_irq;
> int sfty_ue_irq;
> int rx_irq[MTL_MAX_RX_QUEUES];
> @@ -297,6 +298,7 @@ struct stmmac_priv {
> void __iomem *ptpaddr;
> void __iomem *estaddr;
> unsigned long active_vlans[BITS_TO_LONGS(VLAN_N_VID)];
> + int sfty_irq;
> int sfty_ce_irq;
> int sfty_ue_irq;
> int rx_irq[MTL_MAX_RX_QUEUES];
> @@ -305,6 +307,7 @@ struct stmmac_priv {
> char int_name_mac[IFNAMSIZ + 9];
> char int_name_wol[IFNAMSIZ + 9];
> char int_name_lpi[IFNAMSIZ + 9];
> + char int_name_sfty[IFNAMSIZ + 10];
> char int_name_sfty_ce[IFNAMSIZ + 10];
> char int_name_sfty_ue[IFNAMSIZ + 10];
> char int_name_rx_irq[MTL_MAX_TX_QUEUES][IFNAMSIZ + 14];
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> index 47de466e432c..6cf289f192a7 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> @@ -3592,6 +3592,10 @@ static void stmmac_free_irq(struct net_device *dev,
> if (priv->wol_irq > 0 && priv->wol_irq != dev->irq)
> free_irq(priv->wol_irq, dev);
> fallthrough;
> + case REQ_IRQ_ERR_SFTY:
> + if (priv->sfty_irq > 0 && priv->sfty_irq != dev->irq)
> + free_irq(priv->sfty_irq, dev);
> + fallthrough;
> case REQ_IRQ_ERR_WOL:
> free_irq(dev->irq, dev);
> fallthrough;
> @@ -3759,6 +3763,7 @@ static int stmmac_request_irq_single(struct net_device *dev)
> struct stmmac_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
> enum request_irq_err irq_err;
> int ret;
> + char *int_name;
See my comment below.
>
> ret = request_irq(dev->irq, stmmac_interrupt,
> IRQF_SHARED, dev->name, dev);
> @@ -3798,6 +3803,20 @@ static int stmmac_request_irq_single(struct net_device *dev)
> }
> }
>
> + if (priv->sfty_irq > 0 && priv->sfty_irq != dev->irq) {
> + int_name = priv->int_name_sfty;
> + sprintf(int_name, "%s:%s", dev->name, "safety");
> + ret = request_irq(priv->sfty_irq, stmmac_safety_interrupt,
> + 0, int_name, dev);
> + if (unlikely(ret < 0)) {
> + netdev_err(priv->dev,
> + "%s: alloc safety failed %d (error: %d)\n",
> + __func__, priv->sfty_irq, ret);
> + irq_err = REQ_IRQ_ERR_SFTY;
> + goto irq_error;
> + }
> + }
> +
Omg, I thought this change belonged to stmmac_request_irq_multi_msi().
My bad, sorry. Please move the code above to
stmmac_request_irq_multi_msi() and get back the part in
stmmac_request_irq_single() as it was in v5, but instead of specifying
"safety" IRQ name use "dev->name" as the rest of similar code snippets
in here have:
+ if (priv->sfty_irq > 0 && priv->sfty_irq != dev->irq) {
+ ret = request_irq(priv->sfty_irq, stmmac_safety_interrupt,
+ 0, dev->name, dev);
+ if (unlikely(ret < 0)) {
+ netdev_err(priv->dev,
+ "%s: alloc safety failed %d (error: %d)\n",
+ __func__, priv->sfty_irq, ret);
+ irq_err = REQ_IRQ_ERR_SFTY;
+ goto irq_error;
+ }
+ }
I guess at some point afterwards we'll need to refactor the IRQs
request part of this driver: replace stmmac_request_irq_single() body
with the upper part of the stmmac_request_irq_multi_msi() method and
then just make the former method being called from the later one...
> return 0;
>
> irq_error:
> @@ -7462,8 +7481,10 @@ int stmmac_dvr_probe(struct device *device,
> priv->dev->irq = res->irq;
> priv->wol_irq = res->wol_irq;
> priv->lpi_irq = res->lpi_irq;
> + priv->sfty_irq = res->sfty_irq;
> priv->sfty_ce_irq = res->sfty_ce_irq;
> priv->sfty_ue_irq = res->sfty_ue_irq;
> +
Please drop this change. The code below is attached to the code above
because it basically does the same but in the loop.
> for (i = 0; i < MTL_MAX_RX_QUEUES; i++)
> priv->rx_irq[i] = res->rx_irq[i];
> for (i = 0; i < MTL_MAX_TX_QUEUES; i++)
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c
> index 1ffde555da47..3808a3225a7d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c
> @@ -726,6 +726,15 @@ int stmmac_get_platform_resources(struct platform_device *pdev,
> dev_info(&pdev->dev, "IRQ eth_lpi not found\n");
> }
>
> + stmmac_res->sfty_irq =
> + platform_get_irq_byname_optional(pdev, "sfty");
> +
Please drop this change too. It's normal to have a method call
attached to the error check statement especially seeing the rest of
the similar code snippets are designed that way in this function.
-Serge(y)
> + if (stmmac_res->sfty_irq < 0) {
> + if (stmmac_res->sfty_irq == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> + return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "IRQ safety IRQ not found\n");
> + }
> +
> stmmac_res->addr = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
>
> return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(stmmac_res->addr);
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>
