Re: [PATCH 1/4] cpufreq: Add a cpufreq pressure feedback for the scheduler

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 12/12/23 14:27, Vincent Guittot wrote:
Provide to the scheduler a feedback about the temporary max available
capacity. Unlike arch_update_thermal_pressure, this doesn't need to be
filtered as the pressure will happen for dozens ms or more.

Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  include/linux/cpufreq.h   | 10 ++++++++
  2 files changed, 58 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 44db4f59c4cc..7d5f71be8d29 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -2563,6 +2563,50 @@ int cpufreq_get_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int cpu)
  }
  EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpufreq_get_policy);
+DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, cpufreq_pressure);
+EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_pressure);

Why do we export this variable when we have get/update functions?
Do we expect modules would manipulate those per-cpu variables
independently and not like we do per-cpumask in the update func.?




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux