Hi Vincent, I've been waiting for this feature, thanks! On 12/12/23 14:27, Vincent Guittot wrote:
Following the consolidation and cleanup of CPU capacity in [1], this serie reworks how the scheduler gets the pressures on CPUs. We need to take into account all pressures applied by cpufreq on the compute capacity of a CPU for dozens of ms or more and not only cpufreq cooling device or HW mitigiations. we split the pressure applied on CPU's capacity in 2 parts: - one from cpufreq and freq_qos - one from HW high freq mitigiation. The next step will be to add a dedicated interface for long standing capping of the CPU capacity (i.e. for seconds or more) like the scaling_max_freq of cpufreq sysfs. The latter is already taken into account by this serie but as a temporary pressure which is not always the best choice when we know that it will happen for seconds or more. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20231211104855.558096-1-vincent.guittot@xxxxxxxxxx/ Vincent Guittot (4): cpufreq: Add a cpufreq pressure feedback for the scheduler sched: Take cpufreq feedback into account thermal/cpufreq: Remove arch_update_thermal_pressure() sched: Rename arch_update_thermal_pressure into arch_update_hw_pressure arch/arm/include/asm/topology.h | 6 +-- arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h | 6 +-- drivers/base/arch_topology.c | 26 ++++----- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++ drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c | 4 +- drivers/thermal/cpufreq_cooling.c | 3 -- include/linux/arch_topology.h | 8 +-- include/linux/cpufreq.h | 10 ++++ include/linux/sched/topology.h | 8 +-- .../{thermal_pressure.h => hw_pressure.h} | 14 ++--- include/trace/events/sched.h | 2 +- init/Kconfig | 12 ++--- kernel/sched/core.c | 8 +-- kernel/sched/fair.c | 53 ++++++++++--------- kernel/sched/pelt.c | 18 +++---- kernel/sched/pelt.h | 16 +++--- kernel/sched/sched.h | 4 +- 17 files changed, 152 insertions(+), 94 deletions(-) rename include/trace/events/{thermal_pressure.h => hw_pressure.h} (55%)
I would like to test it, but something worries me. Why there is 0/5 in this subject and only 4 patches? Could you tell me your base branch that I can apply this, please? Regards, Lukasz
