On 11/12/2023 10:50, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
On 11.12.2023 10:46, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Mon, 11 Dec 2023 at 11:33, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 10.12.2023 00:21, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
Expand Combo USB+DP QMP PHY device node with the OF ports required to
support USB-C / DisplayPort switching.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8150.dtsi | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8150.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8150.dtsi
index ea7c92c0e405..38423a9f8408 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8150.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8150.dtsi
@@ -3447,6 +3447,29 @@ usb_1_qmpphy: phy@88e8000 {
#phy-cells = <1>;
status = "disabled";
+
+ ports {
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+
+ port@0 {
+ reg = <0>;
+ usb_1_qmpphy_out: endpoint {};
style 1
+ };
+
+ port@1 {
+ reg = <1>;
+
+ usb_1_qmpphy_usb_ss_in: endpoint {
+ };
style 2
+ };
+
+ port@2 {
+ reg = <2>;
+
+ usb_1_qmpphy_dp_in: endpoint {};
style 3
:(
Which one should I stick to?
style 2 seems to be used in 8650
I used style 2 for 8450/8550/8650 usb & dp ports, but the 3 styles are present in the qcom dts.
Neil
Konrad
