On 12/11/2023 1:31 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Mon, 11 Dec 2023 at 23:16, Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 12/8/2023 3:19 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 at 07:07, Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Add CDM blocks to the sc7280 dpu_hw_catalog to support
YUV format output from writeback block.
changes in v2:
- remove explicit zero assignment for features
- move sc7280_cdm to dpu_hw_catalog from the sc7280
catalog file as its definition can be re-used
Signed-off-by: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
.../gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_7_2_sc7280.h | 1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c | 10 ++++++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h | 13 +++++++++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_mdss.h | 5 +++++
4 files changed, 29 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_7_2_sc7280.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_7_2_sc7280.h
index 209675de6742..19c2b7454796 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_7_2_sc7280.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_7_2_sc7280.h
@@ -248,6 +248,7 @@ const struct dpu_mdss_cfg dpu_sc7280_cfg = {
.mdss_ver = &sc7280_mdss_ver,
.caps = &sc7280_dpu_caps,
.mdp = &sc7280_mdp,
+ .cdm = &sc7280_cdm,
.ctl_count = ARRAY_SIZE(sc7280_ctl),
.ctl = sc7280_ctl,
.sspp_count = ARRAY_SIZE(sc7280_sspp),
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
index d52aae54bbd5..1be3156cde05 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
@@ -426,6 +426,16 @@ static const struct dpu_dsc_sub_blks dsc_sblk_1 = {
.ctl = {.name = "ctl", .base = 0xF80, .len = 0x10},
};
+/*************************************************************
+ * CDM sub block config
Nit: it is not a subblock config.
Ack.
+ *************************************************************/
+static const struct dpu_cdm_cfg sc7280_cdm = {
I know that I have r-b'ed this patch. But then one thing occurred to
me. If this definition is common to all (or almost all) platforms, can
we just call it dpu_cdm or dpu_common_cdm?
+ .name = "cdm_0",
+ .id = CDM_0,
+ .len = 0x228,
+ .base = 0x79200,
+};
hmmm .... almost common but not entirely ... msm8998's CDM has a shorter
len of 0x224 :(
Then sdm845_cdm?
That also has a shorter cdm length.
BTW, sdm845 is not in this series. It will be part of RFT as we discussed.
+
/*************************************************************
* VBIF sub blocks config
*************************************************************/
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h
index e3c0d007481b..ba82ef4560a6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h
@@ -682,6 +682,17 @@ struct dpu_vbif_cfg {
u32 memtype[MAX_XIN_COUNT];
};
+/**
+ * struct dpu_cdm_cfg - information of chroma down blocks
+ * @name string name for debug purposes
+ * @id enum identifying this block
+ * @base register offset of this block
+ * @features bit mask identifying sub-blocks/features
+ */
+struct dpu_cdm_cfg {
+ DPU_HW_BLK_INFO;
+};
+
/**
* Define CDP use cases
* @DPU_PERF_CDP_UDAGE_RT: real-time use cases
@@ -805,6 +816,8 @@ struct dpu_mdss_cfg {
u32 wb_count;
const struct dpu_wb_cfg *wb;
+ const struct dpu_cdm_cfg *cdm;
+
u32 ad_count;
u32 dspp_count;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_mdss.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_mdss.h
index a6702b2bfc68..f319c8232ea5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_mdss.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_mdss.h
@@ -185,6 +185,11 @@ enum dpu_dsc {
DSC_MAX
};
+enum dpu_cdm {
+ CDM_0 = 1,
+ CDM_MAX
+};
+
enum dpu_pingpong {
PINGPONG_NONE,
PINGPONG_0,
--
2.40.1
