Am Montag, den 23.11.2015, 14:31 +0100 schrieb Lucas Stach: > Am Mittwoch, den 18.11.2015, 07:57 -0700 schrieb Lina Iyer: > > From: Axel Haslam <ahaslam+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > The generic_pm_domain structure uses an array of latencies to be able to > > declare multiple intermediate states. > > > > Declare a single "OFF" state with the default latencies So that the > > power_off_latency_ns and power_on_latency_ns fields of generic_pm_domain > > structure can be eventualy removed. > > > > Signed-off-by: Axel Haslam <ahaslam+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@xxxxxxxxxx> > > [Lina: pm_genpd_init() argument change] > > --- > > arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c | 14 ++++++++++++-- > > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c > > index 8e7976a..b070e06 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c > > @@ -368,13 +368,23 @@ static struct generic_pm_domain imx6q_arm_domain = { > > .name = "ARM", > > }; > > > > +static struct genpd_power_state imx6q_arm_domain_states[] = { > > Those states are for the PU, not the ARM domain. > > > + { > > + .name = "OFF", > > + .power_off_latency_ns = 25000, > > + .power_on_latency_ns = 2000000, > > + }, > > +}; > > + > > static struct pu_domain imx6q_pu_domain = { > > .base = { > > .name = "PU", > > .power_off = imx6q_pm_pu_power_off, > > .power_on = imx6q_pm_pu_power_on, > > - .power_off_latency_ns = 25000, > > - .power_on_latency_ns = 2000000, > > + .gov = NULL, > > + .status = GPD_STATE_POWER_OFF, > > The above 2 lines should not be needed. This is a static struct, so .gov > will already be NULL. status is set by pm_genpd_init() and the above > value is actively wrong. > > > + .states = imx6q_arm_domain_states, > > + .state_count = ARRAY_SIZE(imx6q_arm_domain_states), > > }, > > }; > > > > How urgent is this patch? I have a series to rework the GPC driver > almost ready and I could fold this change in directly if it's okay for > this to sit through a review of the rework. And I just noticed this depends on changes that are not already in v4.4-rc. Why is this sent as a single patch and not as part of the series adding multiple state support to genpd? Regards, Lucas -- Pengutronix e.K. | Lucas Stach | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html