On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 09:38:17PM -0800, Gaurav Kashyap wrote: > Add documentation for the ice-use-hwkm property in > qcom ice. Please describe the problem that you're solving by adding this property to the binding (the description of hardware/firmware). > > Signed-off-by: Gaurav Kashyap <quic_gaurkash@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../bindings/crypto/qcom,inline-crypto-engine.yaml | 7 +++++++ > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/qcom,inline-crypto-engine.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/qcom,inline-crypto-engine.yaml > index ca4f7d1cefaa..93e017dddc9d 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/qcom,inline-crypto-engine.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/qcom,inline-crypto-engine.yaml > @@ -24,6 +24,13 @@ properties: > clocks: > maxItems: 1 > > + qcom,ice-use-hwkm: > + type: boolean > + description: > + Use the supported Hardware Key Manager (HWKM) in Qualcomm > + ICE to support wrapped keys. This dictates if wrapped keys > + have to be used by ICE. As described it sounds like software configuration, rather than a description of the capabilities of the hardware/firmware. In what cases would we, and would we not, specify this property? Regards, Bjorn > + > required: > - compatible > - reg > -- > 2.25.1 > >