Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] arm64: defconfig: Enable SDM660 Clock Controllers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 7 Dec 2023 at 21:26, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/7/23 19:54, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Thu, 7 Dec 2023 at 18:27, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 09:53:18PM +0100, Petr Vorel wrote:
> >>> From: Petr Vorel <petr.vorel@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>>
> >>> Enable support for the multimedia clock controller on SDM660 devices
> >>> and graphics clock controller on SDM630/636/660 devices.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel <petr.vorel@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>> ---
> >>> Changes v1->v2:
> >>> * added commit message (not just the subject)
> >>>
> >>> NOTE motivation for this is that some not yet mainlined DTS already use
> >>> both:
> >>>
> >>> https://github.com/sdm660-mainline/linux/blob/sdm660-next-stable/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm636-asus-x00td.dts
> >>>
> >>> Kind regards,
> >>> Petr
> >>>
> >>>   arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 2 ++
> >>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
> >>> index acba803835b9..10a098aa8b1b 100644
> >>> --- a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
> >>> +++ b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
> >>> @@ -1235,6 +1235,8 @@ CONFIG_SC_GCC_8180X=y
> >>>   CONFIG_SC_GCC_8280XP=y
> >>>   CONFIG_SC_GPUCC_8280XP=m
> >>>   CONFIG_SC_LPASSCC_8280XP=m
> >>> +CONFIG_SDM_MMCC_660=m
> >>> +CONFIG_SDM_GPUCC_660=y
> >>
> >> I'd expect the GPU clock controller to be a module, can you please
> >> clarify why it needs to be builtin?
> >
> > To allow the display to be enabled early enough?
> That sounds like a terrible bug in drm/msm.. Display should
> be wholly separate from Adreno.

Let me quote Rob's email ([1])

Userspace does have better support for split display/gpu these days
than it did when drm/msm was first merged.  It _might_ just work if
one device only advertised DRIVER_RENDER and the other
MODESET/ATOMIC.. but I'd be a bit concerned about breaking things.  I
guess you could try some sort of kconfig knob to have two "msm"
devices and see what breaks, but I'm a bit skeptical that we could
make this the default anytime soon.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/CAF6AEGs89FRmFsENLkP-Dg1ZJN2LzCfxY2-+do9jH9b8L-XZxg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/



--
With best wishes
Dmitry




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux