On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 06:40:09PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote: > OK. How about, "qcom,broken-refclk"? This reflects the fact that the default > refclk operation is broken on this platform, so the OS should be prepared for > it (by keeping it always on). Shouldn't that be qcom,broken-clkreq since its the CLKREQ# signal used to request REFCLK that is broken, not the REFCLK itself? Johan
