Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] drm/msm/dpu: Add mutex lock in control vblank irq

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 05:40:55PM -0800, Paloma Arellano wrote:
> Add a missing mutex lock to control vblank irq. Thus prevent race
> conditions when registering/unregistering the irq callback.
> 

I'm guessing that the mutex is needed because vblank_refcount, while
being an atomic_t, doesn't actually provide any protection during
concurrency?

I also tried to follow the calls backwards, but I'm uncertain how you
end up here concurrently.

When wrapped in proper mutual exclusion, can't vblank_refcount just be
turned into an "int"...given that you're not actually able to rely on
it's atomic behavior anyways...


So, please rewrite the commit message with a detailed description of how
the concurrency happens, and please review if vblank_refcount should be
an atomic at all...

> v2: Slightly changed wording of commit message
> v3: Mistakenly did not change wording in last version. It is done now.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paloma Arellano <quic_parellan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c          | 6 ++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys.h     | 6 ++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_cmd.c | 2 ++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_vid.c | 2 ++
>  4 files changed, 16 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c
> index 1cf7ff6caff4e..19ff7d1d5ccad 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c
> @@ -119,6 +119,8 @@ enum dpu_enc_rc_states {
>   *	Virtual encoder defers as much as possible to the physical encoders.
>   *	Virtual encoder registers itself with the DRM Framework as the encoder.
>   * @base:		drm_encoder base class for registration with DRM
> + * @vblank_ctl_lock:	Vblank ctl mutex lock to protect physical encoder
> + * 						for IRQ purposes

I think this protects vblank_refcount, so state that instead of the
vague "for IRQ purposes".

>   * @enc_spinlock:	Virtual-Encoder-Wide Spin Lock for IRQ purposes
>   * @enabled:		True if the encoder is active, protected by enc_lock
>   * @num_phys_encs:	Actual number of physical encoders contained.
> @@ -166,6 +168,7 @@ enum dpu_enc_rc_states {
>   */
>  struct dpu_encoder_virt {
>  	struct drm_encoder base;
> +	struct mutex vblank_ctl_lock;
>  	spinlock_t enc_spinlock;
>  
>  	bool enabled;
> @@ -2255,6 +2258,7 @@ static int dpu_encoder_setup_display(struct dpu_encoder_virt *dpu_enc,
>  	phys_params.dpu_kms = dpu_kms;
>  	phys_params.parent = &dpu_enc->base;
>  	phys_params.enc_spinlock = &dpu_enc->enc_spinlock;
> +	phys_params.vblank_ctl_lock = &dpu_enc->vblank_ctl_lock;
>  
>  	WARN_ON(disp_info->num_of_h_tiles < 1);
>  
> @@ -2386,6 +2390,7 @@ struct drm_encoder *dpu_encoder_init(struct drm_device *dev,
>  	dpu_enc->enabled = false;
>  	mutex_init(&dpu_enc->enc_lock);
>  	mutex_init(&dpu_enc->rc_lock);
> +	mutex_init(&dpu_enc->vblank_ctl_lock);

Is this somehow propagated to multiple different dpu_encoder_phys
instances, or why do you need to initialize it here and pass the pointer
through 2 different intermediate structures before assigning it to
phys_enc->vblank_ctl_lock below?

>  
>  	ret = dpu_encoder_setup_display(dpu_enc, dpu_kms, disp_info);
>  	if (ret)
> @@ -2495,6 +2500,7 @@ void dpu_encoder_phys_init(struct dpu_encoder_phys *phys_enc,
>  	phys_enc->dpu_kms = p->dpu_kms;
>  	phys_enc->split_role = p->split_role;
>  	phys_enc->enc_spinlock = p->enc_spinlock;
> +	phys_enc->vblank_ctl_lock = p->vblank_ctl_lock;

Could you not just mutex_init() the one and only vblank_ctl_lock here?

>  	phys_enc->enable_state = DPU_ENC_DISABLED;
>  
>  	atomic_set(&phys_enc->vblank_refcount, 0);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys.h
> index 6f04c3d56e77c..5691bf6b82ee6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys.h
> @@ -155,6 +155,8 @@ enum dpu_intr_idx {
>   * @hw_wb:		Hardware interface to the wb registers
>   * @dpu_kms:		Pointer to the dpu_kms top level
>   * @cached_mode:	DRM mode cached at mode_set time, acted on in enable
> + * @vblank_ctl_lock:	Vblank ctl mutex lock to protect physical encoder
> + * 						for IRQ purposes

Same here.

>   * @enabled:		Whether the encoder has enabled and running a mode
>   * @split_role:		Role to play in a split-panel configuration
>   * @intf_mode:		Interface mode
> @@ -183,6 +185,7 @@ struct dpu_encoder_phys {
>  	struct dpu_hw_wb *hw_wb;
>  	struct dpu_kms *dpu_kms;
>  	struct drm_display_mode cached_mode;
> +	struct mutex *vblank_ctl_lock;
>  	enum dpu_enc_split_role split_role;
>  	enum dpu_intf_mode intf_mode;
>  	spinlock_t *enc_spinlock;
> @@ -253,6 +256,8 @@ struct dpu_encoder_phys_cmd {
>   * @split_role:		Role to play in a split-panel configuration
>   * @hw_intf:		Hardware interface to the intf registers
>   * @hw_wb:		Hardware interface to the wb registers
> + * @vblank_ctl_lock:	Vblank ctl mutex lock to protect physical encoder
> + * 						for IRQ purposes

And here...

Regards,
Bjorn

>   * @enc_spinlock:	Virtual-Encoder-Wide Spin Lock for IRQ purposes
>   */
>  struct dpu_enc_phys_init_params {
> @@ -261,6 +266,7 @@ struct dpu_enc_phys_init_params {
>  	enum dpu_enc_split_role split_role;
>  	struct dpu_hw_intf *hw_intf;
>  	struct dpu_hw_wb *hw_wb;
> +	struct mutex *vblank_ctl_lock;
>  	spinlock_t *enc_spinlock;
>  };
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_cmd.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_cmd.c
> index 25babfe1f001a..dcf1f6a18ad6e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_cmd.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_cmd.c
> @@ -244,6 +244,7 @@ static int dpu_encoder_phys_cmd_control_vblank_irq(
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> +	mutex_lock(phys_enc->vblank_ctl_lock);
>  	refcount = atomic_read(&phys_enc->vblank_refcount);
>  
>  	/* Slave encoders don't report vblank */
> @@ -275,6 +276,7 @@ static int dpu_encoder_phys_cmd_control_vblank_irq(
>  	}
>  
>  end:
> +	mutex_unlock(phys_enc->vblank_ctl_lock);
>  	if (ret) {
>  		DRM_ERROR("vblank irq err id:%u pp:%d ret:%d, enable %s/%d\n",
>  			  DRMID(phys_enc->parent),
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_vid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_vid.c
> index 8e905d7267f9f..87bb49763785d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_vid.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_vid.c
> @@ -364,6 +364,7 @@ static int dpu_encoder_phys_vid_control_vblank_irq(
>  	int ret = 0;
>  	int refcount;
>  
> +	mutex_lock(phys_enc->vblank_ctl_lock);
>  	refcount = atomic_read(&phys_enc->vblank_refcount);
>  
>  	/* Slave encoders don't report vblank */
> @@ -394,6 +395,7 @@ static int dpu_encoder_phys_vid_control_vblank_irq(
>  	}
>  
>  end:
> +	mutex_unlock(phys_enc->vblank_ctl_lock);
>  	if (ret) {
>  		DRM_ERROR("failed: id:%u intf:%d ret:%d enable:%d refcnt:%d\n",
>  			  DRMID(phys_enc->parent),
> -- 
> 2.41.0
> 
> 




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux