On Thu, 23 Nov 2023 at 08:39, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 14-11-23, 11:07, Stephan Gerhold wrote: > > The power domain scaling setup for QCS404 and MSM8909 in > > cpufreq-com-nvmem does not work correctly at the moment because the > > genpd core ignores all the performance state votes that are specified in > > the CPU OPP table. This happens because nothing in the driver makes the > > genpd core aware that the power domains are actively being consumed by > > the CPU. > > > > Fix this by marking the devices as runtime active. Also mark the devices > > to be in the "awake path" during system suspend so that performance > > state votes necessary for the CPU are preserved during system suspend. > > > > While all the patches in this series are needed for full functionality, > > the cpufreq and pmdomain patches can be merged independently. There is > > no compile-time dependency between those two. > > > > Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Changes in v3: > > - Drop patches with MSM8909 definitions that were applied already > > - Add extra patch to fix system suspend properly by using > > device_set_awake_path() instead of dev_pm_syscore_device() > > - Set GENPD_FLAG_ACTIVE_WAKEUP for rpmpd so that performance state votes > > needed by the CPU are preserved during suspend > > - Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231018-msm8909-cpufreq-v2-0-0962df95f654@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Applied. Thanks. > > I picked the pmdomain patch too, lemme know if that needs to go via > some other tree. Usually I should pick the pmdomain patches. Although, I thought it may be better to keep this series together. Assuming you are going to send these as fixes for 6.7-rc[n]? In that case, I can just rebase my tree on a later rc if I find any problems. Kind regards Uffe
