On 22/11/2023 19:55, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
On 11/18/23 13:11, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
Right now we use fixed indexes to assign power-domains, with a
requirement for the TOP GDSC to come last in the list.
Adding support for named power-domains means the declaration in the dtsi
can come in any order.
After this change we continue to support the old indexing - if a SoC
resource declaration or the in-use dtb doesn't declare power-domain names
we fall back to the default legacy indexing.
From this point on though new SoC additions should contain named
power-domains, eventually we will drop support for legacy indexing.
Tested-by: Matti Lehtimäki <matti.lehtimaki@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
So, this commit should be a NOP within this series?
res->pd_name isn't defined anywhere afaics
Konrad
This series is mergeable though the linux-media tree standalone, yes.
Once merged, the dtsi change given in the cover letter will be submitted.
The sm8250 change is posted here :
https://git.codelinaro.org/bryan.odonoghue/kernel/-/tree/b4/b4-camss-named-power-domains-v5+sm8250
---
bod
